The Hurt Locker in Comparison to
Restrepo
After watching a Hollywood film
about war and then seeing one documentary that was completely raw, it
made me question what was accurate in the Hollywood film. While
watching the documentary film Restrepo
I was constantly comparing and contrasting the actuality of Restrepo
to The Hurt Locker.
One
of the first things I noticed was the cohesiveness of the men on post
at Restrepo compared to the group of men in The
Hurt Locker. In
the Restrepo group they always stick together, and there is an
overall sense of friendship within the fleet. Another aspect of
Restrepo
that I saw that was not depicted in The
Hurt Locker is
the troops' role in negotiating with the locals.
Overall,
I see The Hurt
Locker as
more of a Hollywood attraction more than it is an accurate depiction
of war in Afghanistan.
In
Restrepo, all
of the men are cohesive in that they do not fight, they all get along
and they all function well together. In The
Hurt Locker
James does his own thing and doesn't have any
regard
for Sanborn and Eldridge. The way that James does everything his own
way against orders would be an absurd idea in the context of
Restrepo.
All of the men follow orders and work together as a team. No one man
stands out and tries to be the hero. Richard
Allen Smith
states that “what is truly disrespectful of service members was the
portrayal of the EOD team members as undisciplined, boozing, fighting
children with no discipline or respect for their chain of command.”
In my previous blog post I addressed the question that is “Is
The
Hurt Locker
a Thriller or a Moralization?”.
Richard
Allen Smith
states that “in
fact, most of the scenes-In The
Hurt Locker-
rely on oddly and unrealistically contrived situations to induce a
stressful reaction from the audience."
Smith states that “The
Hurt Locker
exaggerates and creates unrealistic
situations
to induce a certain emotion from the film.” This is also apparent
when you compare it to Restrepo.
None of the stressful and emotionally stimulating scenes in Restrepo
are due to a heroic act, like James's. The emotionally stimulating
parts of Restrepo
are
real and
are in no way exaggerated.
Restrepo,
in my opinion, combines many different aspects of war within the film
and doesn't limit itself to combat. Although the Korengal Valley is a
heavy-combat area, this is not the only
thing the movie focuses on. One aspect of the documentary that
shocked me was how much the American soldiers negotiated and
communicated with the indigenous people. I have never seen this
aspect of war depicted in any war movie I have ever seen. It is
intriguing how the locals react to the things that the Americans do.
When the Americans kill the seriously injured cow the locals want
financial compensation for it. Although this roused tension between
the Americans and the Afghanistan elders, the Americans showed their
respect by attending the traditional shura
meetings
held by the elders. One of the main purposes for the deployment of
troops into the Korengal Valley was to facilitate negotiations with
the indigenous people and I really liked seeing this side of war. On
the other hand, The
Hurt Locker
shows no negotiation
with
the locals. Unless you consider threatening a form of negotiation,
then the Americans in this movie do not negotiate with the locals.
Other than James interacting with the young boy who sells DVDs, the
Americans do not interact or even attempt to negotiate with the
locals. The only interaction is in terms of suspicion of IEDs.
After
watching Restrepo,
I quickly realized that the notion of what I thought war was like was
far from true. I am glad that Restrepo
was filmed and that it is a raw documentary. I believe that all of
the public should see this film to correct their twisted notions of
what war is like. Hollywood is responsible for the common
misconceptions including the idea that war is all about combat, and
how the men act and interact with each other. The
Hurt Locker is
narrow in its focus, it only focuses on the combat aspect of war when
Restrepo
reveals
to us that combat is not the only aspect of war. The
Hurt Locker depiected
the men's off-time as a time to get wasted and act roudy. Restrepo
proves to us that this is not the case at all. In their off time the
men bond with each other, play music, dance or play games, all of
these very non-violent actions. Restrepo
is an imformitive and revealing piece of information that shows us
what is true about war.
I agree with the differences you noted in the two movies and how they relate to different aspects of Hollywood. BOth were great films but just depict the was as very different things and I think how you highlighted them was a great idea.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! There are major differences in the movies namely, the fact that "restrepo" is a documentary. What goes on in the movie is real. They aren't concerned with ratings.
ReplyDelete